Tuesday, December 28, 2010

NBSI: Not just for nullsec

The acronyms flying around EVE are as rampant as they are in the U.S. military. Fortunately for us, there is a wonderful compendium of definitions available at the EVE Wiki. On of my favorites, and one that creates much consternation, is the NBSI/NRDS balance. For those of you not in the know, NBSI (Not Blue Shoot It) and NRDS (Not Red Don't Shoot) are the two polar positions of most corporations and alliances in nullsec. Our corp was a nullsec corp for a while, and although we currently inhabit losec, we maintain NBSI in the losec pocket we call home. This makes it easy to watch local, which has become more of an issue since our steady presence has led others to the pocket, both looking for kills and a quiet place to explore losec. Making it perfectly clear - we are an NBSI corp in our pocket, and NRDS outside (unless in nullsec). This upsets some folks who are new to either EVE or the whole concept of losec/nullsec. We don't own the space we live in - but since right now we are calling it home, we consider the assets in that space to be ours, and we defend that space and those assets to keep others away.

I think the one difference in losec is that NBSI isn't an automatic target lock. In nullsec, there are no chances for second-guessing - if they are neutral to you they are an enemy - clear and simple. However, in losec, there is occasionally an opportunity for discussion, a choice to be made - do we allow you to continue to access assets in our home, or deny them? A lot of that choice comes down to the attitude, and (frankly) the mood of our combat pilots. But it never hurts to ask - and don't call it piracy or ransom. If we ask for ISK to use our space, consider that you are killing rats (and earning isk that we might earn) or mining rocks that our industry folks might want, thus you are taking isk from us - so a small (and believe me, we don't ask for lots of money) payment for rent seems reasonable to me. We aren't a pirate corp. Frankly we are a bit lost in our direction, but even as an industry corp we need to have free access to the assets in our space, whenever we want or need them, and your presense (as a neutral) is an impediment to our progress. Of course, if you like our area of space, and would like to utilize the assets, we might be recruiting - just hop into our public channel and see.

What about you? If you are a losec (not pirate) corp, do you deny assets (missions/rats/rocks/plexes) to neutrals in the area of space you call home? Better question is, does anyone read this thing?

Our CEO for a while considered having us announce in local, when a neut appeared, that it was NBSI and they should evacuate with their assets intact. I think that's certainly a nice way to play, but shouldn't most people in losec already be worried when jumping into a dead-end system with 15 in local?

3 comments:

  1. It seems your Corp ideology is similar to mine. However we tend to only shoot intruders I they look nasty. (LNSI I guess) we don't mind people mining as belts are numerous. But we don't get many of them. Ratting usually means they end up dead. Like you said, if your stupid enough to rat in a system with 10 people you probably deserve death. Running sites is a no no. However we don't mind haulers coming in and buying/selling stuff. Often get wh's here and don't tend to bother them either.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks - we are still trying to determine the best course of action because it isn't nullsec, and actions here have security status consequences for our PvPers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think in lo-sec it will always be a judgement call. If you lay claim to lo-sec in order to run POSes, harassing miners or passing WH haulers is not really a good use of your time. And there's always the consideration that the people you don't demand rent from, could be willing to help defending the system from an interloping third party.

    It's politics like these which make the game so fascinating :)

    ReplyDelete